Machineryline » Reviews » Backhoe loaders » Caterpillar »

Reviews Backhoe loaders Caterpillar

4.1
Average score of Caterpillar
13 reviews
3.8
3.8 Price
4.1
4.1 Reliability
3.9
3.9 Maintenance
4.4
4.4 Operation
4.5
4.5 Convenience
Search results: 13 reviews
Filter
Add a review
4.8
Backhoe loader Caterpillar 434F
2013 Year
4.0 Price
5.0 Reliability
5.0 Maintenance
5.0 Operation
5.0 Convenience
From the obvious advantages, there is excellent lifting capacity of the front arm. If compared to excavators of other good brands, it measures up. If compared to domestic machinery, then for the most part, it's like comparing heaven and earth, but the price difference is also justified.
4.0
Backhoe loader Caterpillar 428
4.0 Price
4.0 Reliability
4.0 Maintenance
4.0 Operation
4.0 Convenience
I spent a long time choosing an excavator-loader because I had a limited budget. I settled on the Caterpillar brand, model 428. The machine worked fine for the first year. In the second year, there started to be an unclear vibration. The issue was resolved at the service center.
5.0
Backhoe loader Caterpillar 428F
2012 Year
5.0 Price
5.0 Reliability
5.0 Maintenance
5.0 Operation
5.0 Convenience
I chose between Cat and JCB. They say that JCB is better in quality. But for now, I am quite satisfied with the performance of Cat. It handles large volumes quickly (mostly in construction). The hydraulic system operates smoothly. It is comfortable to work with; overall, the machine is well-built. It quickly justifies the investments under good loads.
1 2
Would you like to leave your vehicle review?
Add a review